Skip to content
All Treatments
Cosmetic

Rhinoplasty (Aesthetic / Functional Nose Surgery)

Surgical reshaping of nasal bone, cartilage, and soft tissue for facial harmony and, when indicated, airway function

Duration
2-4 hours (再手術・機能再建では延長あり)
Downtime
10-14 days (swellingは数 months、最終評価12-18 months)
Sessions
通常1 sessions (修正は原則12 months以降に再評価)

About This Treatment

Rhinoplasty surgically reshapes the nasal bones, upper and lower lateral cartilages, septum, tip framework, and soft-tissue envelope. It may address aesthetic goals such as a hump, tip shape, alar width, deviation, or asymmetry, and may also reconstruct the septum or nasal valves to improve breathing. Open and closed approaches can incorporate structural reconstruction, dorsal preservation, osteotomies, and cartilage grafts according to anatomy and goals.

This entry covers surgery and is distinct from the existing nonsurgical nose-thread or filler concepts. ISAPS estimated 1,083,631 procedures worldwide in 2024, making it a high-volume core operation, but year-over-year volume declined and it should not be described as globally accelerating. Current interest emphasizes natural proportions and tissue preservation, yet evidence does not show preservation techniques to be universally superior to structural methods.

Mechanism of Action

Osteotomy or rasping adjusts the bony vault and dorsum, while sutures, selective resection, and cartilage grafting rebuild tip, columellar, and alar support. Functional work may include septoplasty, spreader grafts, and nasal-valve support to preserve or improve airflow. Dorsal-preservation methods retain the osseocartilaginous dorsal continuity where appropriate and lower it with push-down or let-down maneuvers. Skin-envelope contraction, scarring, and long-term cartilage behavior also shape the outcome.

Indications

Nose contourGeneral indication (see detailed description)

Expected Results

Major contour change is visible when the splint is removed after about 1-2 weeks, but edema—especially at the tip—can persist for months, and final assessment usually takes 12-18 months. A 2025 meta-analysis of dorsal preservation versus reduction (10 studies, 1,339 patients) found fewer dorsal irregularities but more residual or recurrent hump with preservation, with no significant difference in functional outcomes, overall aesthetic outcomes, or revision surgery. Patient-reported outcomes generally improve after surgery, but substantial heterogeneity in measures, techniques, and populations prevents guarantees of an individual result or perfect symmetry.

Clinical Evidence

No product-specific peer-reviewed evidence
Treatment database evidence review (2026)
No product-specific peer-reviewed evidence claimed for product-independent surgical rhinoplasty. Evidence assessment
Clinical improvement was reported in this study (see original paper for details).
Indirect / device class
International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2025)
ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2024. ISAPS Global Survey
Clinical improvement was reported in this study (see original paper for details).
Indirect / device class
American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2026)
AAFPRS Reveals the Trends Defining Facial Plastic Surgery. AAFPRS 2025 Annual Survey
Clinical improvement was reported in this study (see original paper for details).
Indirect / device class
Ribeiro LFS, De Freitas LR, Udoma-Udofa OC, et al. (2025)
Dorsal preservation versus dorsal reduction rhinoplasty techniques for aesthetic and functional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Clinical improvement was reported in this study (see original paper for details).
Indirect / device class
Khajuria A, Rupra RS, Daneshi K, et al. (2025)
A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg
Clinical improvement was reported in this study (see original paper for details).
Indirect / device class
Sharif-Askary B, Carlson AR, Van Noord MG, et al. (2020)
Incidence of Postoperative Adverse Events after Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg
Clinical improvement was reported in this study (see original paper for details).

Risks & Side Effects

Substantial swelling, bruising, pain, epistaxis, infection, scarring, sensory or smell change, asymmetry, contour irregularity, tip stiffness, graft warping or resorption, and dissatisfaction may occur. Persistent or worsened obstruction, nasal-valve collapse, septal perforation, skin injury or necrosis, anesthesia complications, rare visual injury, and revision surgery are possible. Smoking, prior surgery, very thick or thin skin, scar tendency, and body-dysmorphic concerns require careful preoperative assessment.

Interested in this treatment?

Start with an AI skin analysis to check your current skin condition

Get AI Skin AnalysisBook Now

Other Treatments

LaserPicoSure ProLearn more LaserFractional LaserLearn more LaserPhotofacial IPL (Stellar M22)Learn more Anti-AgingThermage FLXLearn more